Review: Strong evidence supports perioperative practices to reduce complications from hip fracturePDF
ACP J Club. 2006 Jul-Aug;145:10. doi:10.7326/ACPJC-2006-145-1-010
Clinical Impact Ratings
Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, et al. Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients. A systematic overview of the evidence. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1019-25. [PubMed ID: 16307627]
What are the best treatment practices for older patients with hip fracture?
Data sources: 8 databases, clinical practice guideline Web sites, references of relevant articles, and content experts.
Study selection and assessment: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and high-quality cohort studies of treatment practices in patients > 65 years of age with hip fracture. 50 articles met the selection criteria. Quality assessment of individual studies was based on Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
Outcomes: Hip fracture complications.
The effective treatment practices based on systematic review and RCT evidence are in the Table. Among preoperative care practices, pressure-reducing mattresses reduced development of pressure ulcers, and traction provided no benefit. Delay in surgery > 24 hours was associated with complications, including pressure ulcers. Among operative practices, regional anesthesia was better than general anesthesia. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and antibiotic prophylaxis were effective for reducing DVT and wound infection, respectively. Wound drainage did not affect wound healing problems or transfusion requirements. Better outcomes were seen with intermittent urinary catheters than indwelling catheters, and with epidural than conventional analgesia. Among postoperative practices, nutrition supplementation with protein, vitamins, and minerals was better than placebo or usual care.
In older patients with hip fracture, strong evidence supports several treatment practices during the perioperative period to reduce the rate and severity of complications.
Sources of funding: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and Alberta Health and Wellness.
For correspondence: Dr. L.A. Beaupre, Capital Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Table. Effective treatment practices for older patients with hip fracture*
|Timing of care||Indications or interventions||Number of trials||Comparisons†||Outcomes|
|Preoperative care||Pressure ulcers||1 SR (2 RCTs)||Pressure reducing vs standard mattress||Pressure ulcer development|
|Perioperative care||Fracture fixation||3 SRs (49 RCTs)||Compression hip screws vs various nails for trochanteric or extracapsular fractures||Operative and postoperative complications|
|Anesthetic||2 SRs (163 RCTs)||Regional vs general anesthesia||Mortality, DVT, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and transfusion requirements|
|DVT prophylaxis||1 SR (21 RCTs) + 1 RCT||Heparin, pumping device, or fondaparinux vs placebo||DVT|
|Antibiotic prophylaxis||1 SR (15 RCTs)||Antibiotic vs placebo||Deep and superficial wound infection|
|Urinary catheterization||1 RCT||Intermittent vs indwelling catheter||Time to normal voiding|
|Analgesia||2 RCTs||Epidural vs conventional analgesia||Cardiac complications and pain|
|Postoperative care||Nutrition supplementation||1 SR (15 RCTs) + 1 RCT||Nutrition supplementation vs placebo or usual care||Major complications, length of stay, and death or complications|
*SR = systematic review; RCT = randomized controlled trial; DVT = deep venous thrombosis.
†The first intervention in each comparison cell is the effective treatment practice.
Older adults who sustain hip fractures are at high risk for functional decline, institutionalization, and premature mortality. Minimizing the risk for these adverse outcomes requires coordination of patient care by a team with expertise in several disciplines, including surgery, anesthesia, nursing, internal medicine, rehabilitation, and nutrition.
Beaupre and colleagues have systematically reviewed a wide range of interventions for management of older adults with hip fractures that will interest all of these health care professionals.
In some cases, the cost-effectiveness of the interventions discussed in this review is unclear and warrants additional study. Furthermore, several potentially relevant interventions are not addressed and are worth highlighting for physicians who provide care to older adults with hip fractures.
First, upstream factors contributing to hip fracture should be identified and treated whenever possible. Many patients who have suffered fragility fractures are never evaluated for osteoporosis, which is worrisome given their high risk for recurrent fractures (1). To address this problem, authors of this systematic review are currently recruiting hip fracture patients into a clinical trial to evaluate a nurse-led osteoporosis service (2). Clinicians must also recognize that most hip fractures are the result of falls from standing height (3). A systematic assessment of falls in patients who sustain hip fractures makes intuitive sense, despite the fact that no trial to date has addressed whether this approach would reduce the risk for recurrent fracture.
Second, decisions regarding the timing of surgery should include consideration of perioperative cardiovascular risk (4). In some cases (e.g., when patients present with decompensated heart failure or an acute coronary syndrome), optimization of cardiovascular status may necessitate delays in hip repair.
Third, physicians should appreciate that delirium is common after repair of a hip fracture. Delirium often reflects underlying medical illness or drug toxicity and is associated with poor functional recovery after hip fracture. An RCT has shown that proactive geriatric medicine consultations can reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative delirium (5).
Sudeep S. Gill, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
1. Andrade SE, Majumdar SR, Chan KA, et al. Low frequency of treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women following a fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2052-7. [PubMed ID: 14504118]
2. Randomized trial of osteoporosis intervention strategies in hip fracture patients.www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00175175?order=3.
3. Tinetti ME. Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:42-9. [PubMed ID: 12510042]
4. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:542-53. [PubMed ID: 11823097]
5. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:516-22. [PubMed ID: 11380742]