Review: Orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonabant reduce weight in overweight and obese personsPDF
ACP J Club. 2008 Mar-Apr;148:50. doi:10.7326/ACPJC-2008-148-2-050
Clinical Impact Ratings
Rucker D, Padwal R, Li SK, Curioni C, Lau DC. Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:1194-9. [PubMed ID: 18006966]
In overweight or obese persons, what is the long-term efficacy of antiobesity drugs (AODs) for reducing weight and improving health status?
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and Current Science meta-register of controlled trials (all from December 2002 to 2006); and reference lists.
Study selection and assessment: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) that lasted ≥ 1 year, used intention-to-treat analysis, and evaluated the efficacy of AODs on weight, overall mortality, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, CV morbidity, and CV mortality in overweight or obese participants ≥ 18 years of age. Open-label crossover trials, quasi-RCTs, and abstracts were excluded. Quality assessment of individual studies was based on 9 criteria of the Verhagen Delphi list. 30 RCTs (mean age range 38 to 59 y) met the selection criteria.
Outcomes: Included changes in weight; triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and total cholesterol levels; blood pressure (BP); diabetes; and adverse events.
Meta-analysis showed that orlistat (OST), sibutramine (SBT), and rimonabant (RMB) reduced weight more than did placebo (Table). Compared with placebo, OST reduced LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol levels and BP; SBT increased HDL cholesterol and BP and reduced triglycerides; and RMB increased HDL cholesterol and reduced triglyceride levels and BP (Table). In participants with diabetes, OST and RMB improved glycemic control (Table). In 1 RCT, OST reduced the incidence of diabetes compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.86). OST increased risk for gastrointestinal adverse events; SBT increased risk for insomnia, nausea, dry mouth, and constipation; and RMB increased risk for psychiatric disorders.
Orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonabant reduce weight and improve some health measures in overweight and obese persons.
Source of funding: No external funding.
For correspondence: Dr. R Padwal, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Table. Comparisons of orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonabant with placebo in overweight or obese participants*
|Outcomes at 1 to 4 y||Number of trials (n)||Drug||Weighted mean difference (95% CI)|
|Change in weight (kg)||15 (9833)||Orlistat||−2.87 (−3.21 to −2.53)|
|10 (2348)||Sibutramine||−4.16 (−4.73 to −3.59)|
|4 (4099)||Rimonabant||−4.67 (−5.26 to −4.07)|
|Change in LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)||13 (5206)||Orlistat||−0.26 (−0.30 to −0.22)|
|Change in HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)||11 (4152)||Orlistat||−0.03 (−0.04 to −0.02)|
|5 (977)||Sibutramine||0.04 (0.01 to 0.08)|
|4 (4050)||Rimonabant||0.10 (0.08 to 0.11)|
|Change in total cholesterol (mmol/L)||13 (5206)||Orlistat||−0.32 (−0.37 to −0.28)|
|Change in triglycerides (mmol/L)||4 (785)||Sibutramine||−0.18 (−0.30 to −0.07)|
|4 (4049)||Rimonabant||−0.24 (−0.30 to −0.17)|
|Change in systolic BP (mm Hg)||13 (6965)||Orlistat||−1.52 (−2.19 to −0.86)|
|7 (1906)||Sibutramine||1.69 (0.11 to 3.28)|
|3 (2273)||Rimonabant||−1.78 (−2.81 to −0.76)|
|Change in diastolic BP (mm Hg)||12 (8322)||Orlistat||−1.38 (−2.03 to -0.74)|
|7 (1906)||Sibutramine||2.42 (1.51 to 3.32)|
|3 (2273)||Rimonabant||−1.23 (−1.93 to −0.54)|
|Change in fasting glucose (mmol/L)||5 (1678)||Orlistat||−1.03 (−1.49 to −0.57)|
|1 (1047)||Rimonabant||−0.97 (−1.3 to −0.64)|
|Risk difference (CI)|
|Change in hemoglobin A1c (%)||1 (1047)||Rimonabant||−0.70 (−0.84 to −0.56)|
|5 (1678)||Orlistat||−0.38 (−0.59 to −0.18)|
*BP = blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; CI defined in Glossary. Weighted mean difference based on a random-effects model.
The systematic review by Rucker and colleagues confirms that AODs produce small amounts of weight loss along with an unfortunately high rate of side effects and study attrition. Notably, overall weight loss for all 3 drugs was modest (mean 2.9 to 4.7 kg) and tended to plateau within the first year of each trial.
Both lifestyle interventions (1) and AODs have been proven to reduce weight and improve intermediate metabolic measures in relatively short-term trials. However, maintaining adherence to intensive diet and exercise interventions or AODs has been problematic. Although cohort studies have shown that bariatric surgery reduces chronic disease and overall mortality in patients with severe obesity (2), it is not an ideal solution. Such surgery often produces clinically significant adverse effects and requires life-long adherence and medical management.
Novel interventions that can curb the worldwide obesity epidemic are urgently needed. Since the body has redundant mechanisms to counteract weight loss, multifaceted obesity treatments are needed to target different mechanisms. Clinical trials need to test the additive effect of multiple AODs to maximize weight loss and minimize side effects. This approach would make obesity treatment akin to that of other chronic medical conditions (e.g., diabetes and hypertension).
The clinical utility of these AODs is marginal because of side effects and lack of evidence that their use affects hard outcomes, such as CV events or mortality. Lifestyle change with diet and exercise remain the cornerstone of obesity treatment for most patients. The challenge is to maintain these changes in the long term.
Alka M. Kanaya, MD
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, USA
1. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1755-67. [PubMed ID: 17904936]
2. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741-52. [PubMed ID: 17715408]